IBIH vs. LIBD
IBIH (iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF) and LIBD (LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. IBIH is passively managed, while LIBD is actively managed. Over the past year, IBIH returned 2.27% vs -1.67% for LIBD. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IBIH charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LIBD.
Performance
IBIH vs. LIBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIH achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than LIBD's -2.58% return.
IBIH
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 2.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.54%
LIBD
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- -2.58%
- 1Y
- -1.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $436.09K | $430.66K | $433.48K | |
| $6.72K | $11.19K | $6.51K |
IBIH vs. LIBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 1.12% | 8.54% |
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | -2.58% | -0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIH and LIBD is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IBIH and LIBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIH vs. LIBD — Risk / Return Rank
IBIH
LIBD
IBIH vs. LIBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIH | LIBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.97 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | -0.24 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | -0.49 | +4.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIH vs. LIBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum LIBD drawdown of -7.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIH and LIBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIH | LIBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -7.31% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.70% | -6.96% | +5.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -6.63% | +5.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -3.47% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 3.42% | -2.78% |
Volatility
IBIH vs. LIBD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) is 0.68%, while LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that IBIH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIH | LIBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 1.86% | -1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.37% | 5.84% | -3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05% | 7.83% | -4.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 9.93% | -5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 9.93% | -5.07% |
IBIH vs. LIBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LIBD's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIH vs. LIBD - Dividend Comparison
IBIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, less than LIBD's 11.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 4.97% | 4.68% | 4.34% | 0.70% |
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | 11.85% | 13.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIH and LIBD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIBD has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to IBIH (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIH dropped -3.94% vs LIBD's -7.31%.
On 1-year performance, IBIH leads with 2.27% vs -1.67% for LIBD. On fees, IBIH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIH has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIH has performed better with a 2.27% return vs -1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LIBD.
LIBD has the higher dividend yield at 11.85%, compared with 4.97% for IBIH.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Stone Ridge. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIH and 0.25% for LIBD.
IBIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIH and LIBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer