IBIH vs. GSUI
IBIH (iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF) and GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIH is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while GSUI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate. Both are passively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBIH charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for GSUI.
Performance
IBIH vs. GSUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIH achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than GSUI's -39.93% return.
IBIH
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSUI
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -12.82%
- YTD
- -39.93%
- 6M
- -46.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIH vs. GSUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 1.68% | -0.36% |
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -39.93% | -34.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIH and GSUI is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIH vs. GSUI — Risk / Return Rank
IBIH
GSUI
IBIH vs. GSUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIH | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIH | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | -0.78 | +2.03 |
Drawdowns
IBIH vs. GSUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum GSUI drawdown of -60.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIH and GSUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIH | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -60.73% | +56.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -60.73% | +60.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -43.81% | +42.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility
IBIH vs. GSUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIH | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16% | 107.79% | -104.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 107.79% | -102.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 107.79% | -102.86% |
IBIH vs. GSUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUI's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIH vs. GSUI - Dividend Comparison
IBIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, while GSUI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 3.90% | 4.68% | 4.34% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIH and GSUI have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIH.
IBIH has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.00% for GSUI.
IBIH is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while GSUI is Cryptocurrency. IBIH tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while GSUI tracks CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIH and 0.00% for GSUI.
Find the right allocation for IBIH and GSUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer