PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIH vs. GSUI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIH vs. GSUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIH achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than GSUI's -48.67% return.


IBIH

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.18%
6M
0.59%
YTD
1.12%
1Y
2.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.54%

GSUI

1D
2.50%
1M
-5.46%
6M
-37.48%
YTD
-48.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$283.45K$333.91K$733.77K
$436.09K$430.66K$433.48K

IBIH vs. GSUI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF
1.12%-0.38%
GSUI
Grayscale Sui Staking ETF
-48.67%-42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIH and GSUI is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIH vs. GSUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBIH
IBIH Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IBIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIH Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIH Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GSUI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBIH vs. GSUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBIHGSUIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

IBIH vs. GSUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIH vs. GSUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum GSUI drawdown of -71.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIH and GSUI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIHGSUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-71.63%

+67.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-70.74%

+69.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-55.13%

+54.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

Volatility

IBIH vs. GSUI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIHGSUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05%

99.12%

-96.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.86%

99.12%

-94.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.86%

99.12%

-94.26%

IBIH vs. GSUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUI's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIH vs. GSUI - Dividend Comparison

IBIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, while GSUI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
GSUI
Grayscale Sui Staking ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF
4.97%4.68%4.34%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIH and GSUI have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIH.

IBIH has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 0.00% for GSUI.

IBIH is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while GSUI is Cryptocurrency. IBIH tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while GSUI tracks CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIH and 0.00% for GSUI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIH and GSUI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer