IBIF vs. VTP
IBIF (iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBIF tracks the ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index while VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBIF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTP.
Performance
IBIF vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIF achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 1.51% return.
IBIF
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 4.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIF vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 1.81% | 2.02% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.51% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIF and VTP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIF vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
IBIF
VTP
IBIF vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIF | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIF | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.70 | 1.30 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
IBIF vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIF drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIF and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIF | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -1.92% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.34% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -0.52% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | — | — |
Volatility
IBIF vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIF | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03% | 3.26% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 3.26% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 3.26% | +0.28% |
IBIF vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIF vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
IBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 3.74% | 4.51% | 4.05% | 0.96% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIF and VTP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIF.
IBIF has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
IBIF tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIF and 0.05% for VTP.
Find the right allocation for IBIF and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer