PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIF vs. VTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIF vs. VTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIF achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 1.51% return.


IBIF

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTP

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.20%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIF vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBIF and VTP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIF vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIF
IBIF Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VTP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIF vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIFVTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.65

IBIF vs. VTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIFVTPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

1.30

+0.41

Drawdowns

IBIF vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIF drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIF and VTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIFVTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-1.92%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.34%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-0.52%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

Volatility

IBIF vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIFVTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03%

3.26%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.54%

3.26%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.54%

3.26%

+0.28%

IBIF vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIF vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison

IBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIF
iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF
3.74%4.51%4.05%0.96%
VTP
Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
1.61%1.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIF and VTP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIF.

IBIF has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.

IBIF tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIF and 0.05% for VTP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIF and VTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer