IBIF vs. RLY
IBIF (iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF) and RLY (State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while RLY is a Global Allocation fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIF returned 2.58% vs 27.64% for RLY. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IBIF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.
Performance
IBIF vs. RLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIF achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 15.77% return.
IBIF
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.55%
RLY
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 15.77%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $539.78K | $483.63K | $471.28K | |
| $4.60M | $7.84M | $7.75M |
IBIF vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 1.50% | 7.27% | 3.11% | 3.95% |
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 15.77% | 20.26% | 2.53% | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIF and RLY is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIF vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank
IBIF
RLY
IBIF vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIF | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.48 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 3.66 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 12.77 | -4.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIF vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIF drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIF and RLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIF | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -37.75% | +35.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.95% | -7.54% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -2.74% | +2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -9.40% | +8.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 2.16% | -1.80% |
Volatility
IBIF vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) is 0.47%, while State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that IBIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIF | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 2.68% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.47% | 8.44% | -6.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02% | 10.60% | -8.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 13.46% | -9.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 13.80% | -10.32% |
IBIF vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBIF vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison
IBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than RLY's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 4.94% | 4.51% | 4.05% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 3.06% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIF and RLY have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RLY has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to IBIF (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIF dropped -2.50% vs RLY's -37.75%.
On 1-year performance, RLY leads with 27.64% vs 2.58% for IBIF. On fees, IBIF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIF has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RLY has performed better with a 27.64% return vs 2.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.
IBIF has the higher dividend yield at 4.94%, compared with 3.06% for RLY.
IBIF is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while RLY is Global Allocation. IBIF tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while RLY tracks Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIF and 0.50% for RLY.
RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIF and RLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer