IBIF vs. DGRO
IBIF (iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIF returned 2.58% vs 24.21% for DGRO. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IBIF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
IBIF vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIF achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 13.39% return.
IBIF
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.55%
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 24.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $103.52M | $104.25M | $110.17M | |
| $539.78K | $483.63K | $471.28K |
IBIF vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 1.50% | 7.27% | 3.11% | 3.95% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 13.39% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 6.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIF and DGRO is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIF vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
IBIF
DGRO
IBIF vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIF | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.45 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 3.61 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 14.07 | -5.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIF vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIF drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIF and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIF | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -35.10% | +32.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.95% | -6.47% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -1.35% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -3.41% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 1.66% | -1.30% |
Volatility
IBIF vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) is 0.47%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that IBIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIF | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 3.21% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.47% | 7.12% | -5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02% | 9.61% | -7.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 13.79% | -10.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 16.58% | -13.10% |
IBIF vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIF vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
IBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than DGRO's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.89% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 4.94% | 4.51% | 4.05% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIF and DGRO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRO has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to IBIF (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIF dropped -2.50% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 1-year performance, DGRO leads with 24.21% vs 2.58% for IBIF. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IBIF has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 24.21% return vs 2.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIF.
IBIF has the higher dividend yield at 4.94%, compared with 1.89% for DGRO.
IBIF is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IBIF tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIF and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIF and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer