PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIE vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIE vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIE achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.


IBIE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.31%
YTD
1.90%
1Y
3.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.32%

RBIL

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.26%
6M
2.32%
YTD
2.70%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$698.05K$699.21K$764.03K
$1.12M$1.89M$2.34M

IBIE vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBIE and RBIL is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIE vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBIE
IBIE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IBIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBIE vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBIERBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

2.09

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

7.24

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.03

29.66

-14.63

IBIE vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIE Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIE and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIE vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIE drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIE and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIERBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-0.56%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.72%

-0.56%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.13%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-0.08%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.14%

+0.09%

Volatility

IBIE vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) have volatilities of 0.30% and 0.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIERBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

0.31%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.07%

0.89%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54%

0.97%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

1.06%

+1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.80%

1.06%

+1.74%

IBIE vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIE vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

IBIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than RBIL's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
4.96%4.09%4.23%0.75%
RBIL
F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF
4.16%3.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIE and RBIL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBIL has higher volatility (0.31%) compared to IBIE (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIE dropped -1.70% vs RBIL's -0.56%.

On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 3.94% vs 3.03% for IBIE. On fees, IBIE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 3.94% return vs 3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.

IBIE has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 4.16% for RBIL.

IBIE tracks ICE 2028 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIE and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIE and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer