IBIC vs. ACWI
IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIC returned 4.54% vs 29.18% for ACWI. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. IBIC charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
IBIC vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIC achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return.
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
IBIC vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.37% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.13% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 7.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIC and ACWI is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | -0.02 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between IBIC and ACWI has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIC vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
IBIC
ACWI
IBIC vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIC | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.24 | 1.41 | +0.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.27 | 3.01 | +14.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 67.45 | 13.53 | +53.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIC | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.05 | 2.29 | +2.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.49 | 0.43 | +3.06 |
Drawdowns
IBIC vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIC drawdown since its inception was -0.90%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIC and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIC | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -56.00% | +55.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.26% | -9.73% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.83% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -8.61% | +8.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 2.16% | -2.09% |
Volatility
IBIC vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) is 0.33%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that IBIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIC | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 3.93% | -3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.67% | 10.29% | -9.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90% | 12.78% | -11.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.58% | 16.05% | -14.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.58% | 17.11% | -15.53% |
IBIC vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIC has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBIC vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIC and ACWI have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIC dropped -0.90% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 1-year performance, ACWI leads with 29.18% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 29.18% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.
IBIC is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while ACWI is Global Equities. IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIC and 0.32% for ACWI.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIC and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer