IBHM vs. FTSL
IBHM (iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and FTSL (First Trust Senior Loan Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHM is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index, while FTSL is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by First Trust. IBHM is passively managed, while FTSL is actively managed. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IBHM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FTSL.
Performance
IBHM vs. FTSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBHM
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FTSL
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 6.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.60M | $10.00M | $9.63M | |
| $89.93K | $107.48K | $111.05K |
IBHM vs. FTSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 2.23% |
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 2.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHM and FTSL is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHM vs. FTSL — Risk / Return Rank
IBHM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTSL
IBHM vs. FTSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHM) and First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBHM | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBHM vs. FTSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHM drawdown since its inception was -1.67%, smaller than the maximum FTSL drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHM and FTSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHM | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -22.67% | +21.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | 0.00% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.41% | -0.75% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.63% | — |
Volatility
IBHM vs. FTSL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHM | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.73% | 2.15% | +2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.73% | 3.35% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.73% | 5.18% | -0.45% |
IBHM vs. FTSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSL's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHM vs. FTSL - Dividend Comparison
IBHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than FTSL's 6.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 6.37% | 6.59% | 7.56% | 7.59% | 4.77% | 3.17% | 3.48% | 4.44% | 4.29% | 3.64% | 3.70% | 3.95% |
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHM and FTSL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBHM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBHM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTSL.
FTSL has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 1.58% for IBHM.
IBHM is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FTSL is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHM and 0.70% for FTSL.
Find the right allocation for IBHM and FTSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer