IBHM vs. BBHY
IBHM (iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IBHM tracks the Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index while BBHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBHM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBHY.
Performance
IBHM vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBHM
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBHY
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 6.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- —
IBHM vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 2.84% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHM and BBHY is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHM vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank
IBHM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBHY
IBHM vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHM) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBHM | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBHM vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHM drawdown since its inception was -1.67%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHM and BBHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHM | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -24.98% | +23.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.28% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -2.35% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility
IBHM vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHM | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.92% | 3.63% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 7.27% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 7.50% | -2.58% |
IBHM vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHM vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison
IBHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than BBHY's 7.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 7.09% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IBHM and BBHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHM.
BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.09%, compared with 1.57% for IBHM.
IBHM tracks Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index, while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHM and 0.15% for BBHY.
Find the right allocation for IBHM and BBHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer