PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHL vs. PGHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBHL vs. PGHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHL) and Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHL achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than PGHY's 2.85% return.


IBHL

1D
0.08%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.25%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PGHY

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.91%
YTD
2.85%
6M
2.56%
1Y
7.36%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
4.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHL vs. PGHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBHL and PGHY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHL vs. PGHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHL
IBHL Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IBHL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

PGHY
PGHY Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PGHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGHY Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PGHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGHY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHL vs. PGHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHL) and Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBHLPGHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.43

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.81

9.30

-0.49

IBHL vs. PGHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHL Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the PGHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHL and PGHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBHL vs. PGHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHL drawdown since its inception was -3.70%, smaller than the maximum PGHY drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHL and PGHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHLPGHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-20.50%

+16.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-3.04%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.26%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.45%

-1.64%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.79%

-0.10%

Volatility

IBHL vs. PGHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHL) is 1.15%, while Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that IBHL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBHLPGHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.99%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

3.92%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

5.17%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.36%

5.48%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

7.04%

-1.68%

IBHL vs. PGHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBHL and PGHY have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

IBHL vs. PGHY - Dividend Comparison

IBHL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, less than PGHY's 7.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBHL
iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.28%4.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PGHY
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
7.11%7.24%7.49%7.87%5.12%5.17%5.45%5.32%5.45%5.52%6.26%4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBHL and PGHY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGHY has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to IBHL (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHL dropped -3.70% vs PGHY's -20.50%.

On 1-year performance, PGHY leads with 7.36% vs 6.07% for IBHL. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, IBHL has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PGHY has performed better with a 7.36% return vs 6.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHL and PGHY have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.11%, compared with 6.28% for IBHL.

IBHL tracks Bloomberg 2032 Term High Yield and Income Index, while PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.

IBHL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBHL and PGHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer