IBHJ vs. HYHG
IBHJ (iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IBHJ tracks the Bloomberg 2030 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross while HYHG tracks the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBHJ returned 7.44% vs 7.52% for HYHG. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBHJ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.
Performance
IBHJ vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHJ achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 3.03% return.
IBHJ
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
IBHJ vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.78% | 9.28% | 7.32% | 8.37% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 3.03% | 5.31% | 11.41% | 9.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHJ and HYHG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHJ vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
IBHJ
HYHG
IBHJ vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBHJ | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 3.74 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.69 | 12.28 | +1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBHJ | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.36 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 0.46 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
IBHJ vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHJ drawdown since its inception was -4.93%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHJ and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHJ | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -25.71% | +20.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -2.02% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.32% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -3.04% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.61% | -0.06% |
Volatility
IBHJ vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) is 1.08%, while ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that IBHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHJ | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 1.42% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.21% | 4.30% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08% | 5.56% | -1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 8.16% | -2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 9.15% | -3.21% |
IBHJ vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHJ vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
IBHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, less than HYHG's 6.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.78% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.66% | 6.64% | 6.87% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHJ and HYHG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYHG has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to IBHJ (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHJ dropped -4.93% vs HYHG's -25.71%.
On 1-year performance, HYHG leads with 7.52% vs 7.44% for IBHJ. On fees, IBHJ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHJ has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 7.52% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHJ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.
HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.78%, compared with 6.66% for IBHJ.
IBHJ tracks Bloomberg 2030 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHJ and 0.50% for HYHG.
IBHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBHJ and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer