IBHJ vs. DADS
IBHJ (iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. IBHJ is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBHJ charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
IBHJ vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHJ achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 14.37% return.
IBHJ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 7.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DADS
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBHJ vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.50% | 3.49% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 14.37% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHJ and DADS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHJ vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
IBHJ
DADS
IBHJ vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBHJ | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBHJ | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.73 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
IBHJ vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHJ drawdown since its inception was -4.93%, smaller than the maximum DADS drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHJ and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHJ | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -17.07% | +12.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -2.77% | +2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -7.63% | +7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | — | — |
Volatility
IBHJ vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHJ | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.07% | 17.58% | -13.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.95% | 17.58% | -11.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.95% | 17.58% | -11.63% |
IBHJ vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHJ vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
IBHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than DADS's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.76% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.68% | 6.64% | 6.87% | 3.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHJ and DADS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBHJ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBHJ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
IBHJ has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 2.76% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHJ and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for IBHJ and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer