IBHJ vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IBHJ (iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHJ is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2030 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. IBHJ is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, IBHJ returned 6.70% vs 3.94% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. IBHJ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

IBHJ vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHJ achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.83% return.

IBHJ

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 6M: 2.15%
• 1Y: 6.70%
• 3Y*: 9.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHJ vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF	1.97%	9.28%	2.44%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.83%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHJ and CSHP is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024	-0.07

The correlation between IBHJ and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IBHJ vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHJ

IBHJ Risk / Return Rank: 57
IBHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
IBHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
IBHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IBHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
IBHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 71

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHJ vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBHJ	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	11.09	-9.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	27.60	-25.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	6.46	-5.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	65.45	-62.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.20	381.67	-369.48

IBHJ vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHJ and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBHJ vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHJ drawdown since its inception was -4.93%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHJ and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBHJ	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-0.08%	-4.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.46%	-0.06%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-0.04%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.62%	-0.00%	-0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	0.01%	+0.54%

Volatility

IBHJ vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that IBHJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBHJ	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.18%	0.16%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.29%	0.27%	+3.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16%	0.36%	+3.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.92%	0.41%	+5.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.92%	0.41%	+5.51%

IBHJ vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBHJ vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

IBHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than CSHP's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.91%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF	6.65%	6.64%	6.87%	3.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBHJ and CSHP in my portfolio?

IBHJ and CSHP have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBHJ or CSHP?

IBHJ has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHJ dropped -4.93% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, IBHJ or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, IBHJ leads with 6.70% vs 3.94% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBHJ or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, IBHJ has performed better with a 6.70% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBHJ or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBHJ or CSHP?

IBHJ has the higher dividend yield at 6.65%, compared with 3.91% for CSHP.

What is the main difference between IBHJ and CSHP?

IBHJ is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHJ and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.