PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHJ vs. BBHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBHJ vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHJ achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than BBHY's 1.58% return.


IBHJ

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.50%
6M
2.06%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBHY

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.96%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
8.61%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHJ vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBHJ
iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.50%9.28%7.32%8.37%
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.58%8.51%7.81%8.35%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHJ and BBHY is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.90

The correlation between IBHJ and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHJ vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHJ
IBHJ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IBHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BBHY
BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHJ vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBHJBBHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.02

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.41

13.58

-0.18

IBHJ vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHJ and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBHJBBHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.98

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.64

+0.89

Drawdowns

IBHJ vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHJ drawdown since its inception was -4.93%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHJ and BBHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHJBBHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-24.98%

+20.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-2.37%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.30%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-2.37%

+1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.53%

+0.01%

Volatility

IBHJ vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) have volatilities of 1.09% and 1.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBHJBBHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.12%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

2.86%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

3.62%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.95%

7.26%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.95%

7.53%

-1.58%

IBHJ vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBHJ vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

IBHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, less than BBHY's 6.95% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.95%7.24%7.18%6.49%5.92%4.06%4.73%4.99%5.02%4.81%1.42%
IBHJ
iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.68%6.64%6.87%3.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IBHJ and BBHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBHY has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to IBHJ (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHJ dropped -4.93% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

On 1-year performance, IBHJ leads with 7.29% vs 7.15% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBHJ has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHJ.

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 6.68% for IBHJ.

IBHJ tracks Bloomberg 2030 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHJ and 0.15% for BBHY.

BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBHJ and BBHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer