IBHH vs. HYG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBHH (iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds from iShares - IBHH tracks the Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross while HYG tracks the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBHH returned 8.48%/yr vs 8.48%/yr for HYG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBHH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HYG.

Performance

IBHH vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHH achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.32% return.

IBHH

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 6.59%
• 3Y*: 8.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYG

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 6.51%
• 3Y*: 8.48%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: 4.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHH vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF	1.66%	8.02%	7.53%	12.87%	-6.70%
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.32%	8.59%	7.97%	11.54%	-5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHH and HYG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2022	0.88

The correlation between IBHH and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IBHH vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHH

IBHH Risk / Return Rank: 82
IBHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
IBHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IBHH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
IBHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IBHH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

HYG

HYG Risk / Return Rank: 55
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHH vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBHH	HYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.72	+0.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	2.59	+1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.33	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.41	2.79	+2.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.70	12.34	+9.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBHH vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHH Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHH and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBHH	HYG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	1.72	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.46	+0.27

Drawdowns

IBHH vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHH drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHH and HYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBHH	HYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.05%	-34.25%	+22.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.22%	-2.34%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.66%	-4.56%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.79%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-0.28%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-3.24%	+0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	0.53%	-0.23%

Volatility

IBHH vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) is 0.77%, while iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that IBHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBHH	HYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	1.21%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.08%	3.01%	-0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82%	3.81%	-0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.26%	7.53%	-0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.26%	8.29%	-1.03%

IBHH vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBHH vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

IBHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than HYG's 5.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	5.92%	5.71%	6.01%	5.74%	5.30%	4.02%	4.88%	4.99%	5.54%	5.12%	5.27%	5.90%
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF	6.27%	6.39%	6.93%	6.65%	5.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBHH and HYG in my portfolio?

IBHH and HYG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBHH or HYG?

HYG has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to IBHH (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHH dropped -12.05% vs HYG's -34.25%.

Which ETF is better, IBHH or HYG?

On 3-year performance, HYG leads with 8.48% vs 8.48% for IBHH. On fees, IBHH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHH has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBHH or HYG?

Over the 3-year period, HYG has performed better with a 8.48% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBHH or HYG?

IBHH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBHH or HYG?

IBHH has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 5.92% for HYG.

What is the main difference between IBHH and HYG?

IBHH tracks Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHH and 0.49% for HYG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.