IBHG vs. HYLB
IBHG (iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IBHG tracks the Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross while HYLB tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBHG returned 7.53%/yr vs 8.79%/yr for HYLB. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBHG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HYLB.
Performance
IBHG vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHG achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than HYLB's 1.65% return.
IBHG
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYLB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.06%
- 10Y*
- —
IBHG vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.10% | 6.90% | 7.42% | 11.27% | -8.88% | 1.07% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.65% | 8.74% | 8.14% | 12.03% | -10.80% | 0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHG and HYLB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IBHG and HYLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHG vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank
IBHG
HYLB
IBHG vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBHG | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.36 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.51 | 3.00 | +3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.87 | 12.90 | +10.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBHG | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 1.84 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.58 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
IBHG vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHG drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, smaller than the maximum HYLB drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHG and HYLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHG | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.85% | -22.91% | +9.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.73% | -2.27% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.39% | -4.51% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.09% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -2.43% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | 0.53% | -0.33% |
Volatility
IBHG vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) is 0.59%, while Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that IBHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHG | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | 1.19% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.53% | 2.92% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11% | 3.70% | -1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 7.47% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 8.18% | -1.82% |
IBHG vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHG vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison
IBHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, less than HYLB's 6.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.48% | 6.29% | 6.31% | 5.84% | 5.53% | 4.45% | 5.22% | 5.71% | 5.95% | 5.85% | 0.27% |
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.07% | 6.33% | 7.02% | 6.66% | 5.62% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHG and HYLB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYLB has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to IBHG (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHG dropped -13.85% vs HYLB's -22.91%.
On 3-year performance, HYLB leads with 8.79% vs 7.53% for IBHG. On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYLB has performed better with a 8.79% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHG.
HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 6.07% for IBHG.
IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHG and 0.15% for HYLB.
IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBHG and HYLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer