IBHF vs. ILS
IBHF (iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHF is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IBHF returned 4.31% vs 7.30% for ILS. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. IBHF charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.
Performance
IBHF vs. ILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHF achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 2.01% return.
IBHF
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- —
ILS
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 7.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBHF vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 0.63% | 5.14% |
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 2.01% | 3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHF and ILS is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHF vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank
IBHF
ILS
IBHF vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBHF | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.65 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.01 | 13.54 | -7.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.44 | 49.58 | -30.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBHF vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHF drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHF and ILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHF | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -2.46% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.75% | -0.55% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.00% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -0.54% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 0.15% | +0.08% |
Volatility
IBHF vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) is 0.49%, while Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) has a volatility of 0.87%. This indicates that IBHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHF | ILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 0.87% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.22% | 1.68% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 2.62% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 3.78% | +2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.64% | 3.78% | +1.86% |
IBHF vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHF vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison
IBHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, less than ILS's 8.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.53% | 6.73% | 7.17% | 7.33% | 6.01% | 4.55% | 0.61% |
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | 8.07% | 6.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHF and ILS have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILS has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to IBHF (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHF dropped -11.19% vs ILS's -2.46%.
On 1-year performance, ILS leads with 7.30% vs 4.31% for IBHF. On fees, IBHF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHF has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILS has performed better with a 7.30% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.
ILS has the higher dividend yield at 8.07%, compared with 6.53% for IBHF.
IBHF is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHF and 1.58% for ILS.
ILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBHF and ILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer