PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHE vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBHE vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBHE

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

XLE

1D
1.00%
1M
11.89%
6M
18.26%
YTD
35.03%
1Y
43.49%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
23.67%
10Y*
10.52%
ALL TIME*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.70B$1.73B$1.97B

IBHE vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBHE
iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF
0.00%4.45%7.62%10.32%-4.08%4.40%4.16%5.49%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
35.03%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%-0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHE and XLE is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019

0.31

The correlation between IBHE and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHE vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBHE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBHE vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBHEXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

IBHE vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBHE vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHEXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.62%

Volatility

IBHE vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBHEXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.57%

IBHE vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBHE vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

IBHE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBHE
iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF
1.47%4.53%6.92%7.17%5.77%4.84%5.74%3.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.55%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBHE and XLE have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHE.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 1.47% for IBHE.

IBHE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XLE is Energy Equities. IBHE tracks Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHE and 0.08% for XLE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBHE and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer