IBHE vs. WTIU
IBHE (iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHE is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index, while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). Both are passively managed. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IBHE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
IBHE vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBHE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- 45.95%
- 6M
- 51.31%
- YTD
- 104.80%
- 1Y
- 114.64%
- 3Y*
- 0.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.32M | $870.89K | $849.27K |
IBHE vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 0.00% | 4.45% | 7.62% | 7.95% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 104.80% | -17.13% | -29.63% | -28.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHE and WTIU is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2023 | 0.11 |
The correlation between IBHE and WTIU shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHE vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
IBHE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WTIU
IBHE vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBHE | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBHE vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHE | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -75.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -48.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -75.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -27.41% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -39.21% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.07% | — |
Volatility
IBHE vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHE | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 57.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 69.90% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 70.86% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 70.86% | — |
IBHE vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHE vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBHE nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 1.47% | 4.53% | 6.92% | 7.17% | 5.77% | 4.84% | 5.74% | 3.73% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHE and WTIU have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBHE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBHE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.
IBHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.
IBHE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. IBHE tracks Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index, while WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHE and 0.95% for WTIU.
Find the right allocation for IBHE and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer