IBGL vs. ILTB
IBGL (iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF) and ILTB (iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBGL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2055 Maturity US Treasury Index, while ILTB is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Universal 10+ Year Index (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBGL returned 4.56% vs 7.17% for ILTB. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IBGL charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ILTB.
Performance
IBGL vs. ILTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBGL achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than ILTB's 0.30% return.
IBGL
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- -1.85%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILTB
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 2.78%
- 5Y*
- -2.88%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
IBGL vs. ILTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBGL iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF | -0.23% | 0.99% |
ILTB iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | 0.30% | 4.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBGL and ILTB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | 0.96 |
The correlation between IBGL and ILTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBGL vs. ILTB — Risk / Return Rank
IBGL
ILTB
IBGL vs. ILTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL) and iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBGL | ILTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 1.33 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.58 | 3.38 | -1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBGL | ILTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 0.91 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.35 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
IBGL vs. ILTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBGL drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, smaller than the maximum ILTB drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGL and ILTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBGL | ILTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -36.88% | +27.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -5.42% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -21.28% | +16.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -9.92% | +5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.13% | +0.76% |
Volatility
IBGL vs. ILTB - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) at 2.50%. This indicates that IBGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBGL | ILTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 2.50% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.12% | 5.54% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.28% | 7.88% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.53% | 12.64% | -2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.53% | 11.56% | -1.03% |
IBGL vs. ILTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBGL has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ILTB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBGL vs. ILTB - Dividend Comparison
IBGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than ILTB's 4.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBGL iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF | 4.70% | 3.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILTB iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | 4.96% | 4.83% | 4.91% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 3.45% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 3.99% | 4.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, IBGL and ILTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IBGL has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to ILTB (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBGL dropped -9.37% vs ILTB's -36.88%.
On 1-year performance, ILTB leads with 7.17% vs 4.56% for IBGL. On fees, ILTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ILTB has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILTB has performed better with a 7.17% return vs 4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBGL.
ILTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 4.70% for IBGL.
IBGL is categorized as Government Bonds, while ILTB is Long-Term Bond. IBGL tracks ICE 2055 Maturity US Treasury Index, while ILTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal 10+ Year Index (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGL and 0.06% for ILTB.
ILTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBGL and ILTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer