PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGL.L vs. ISAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGL.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGL.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBGL.L is traded in GBP, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGL.L achieves a -4.18% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 10.73% return. Over the past 10 years, IBGL.L has underperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of -2.49%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.


IBGL.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
-4.05%
6M
-4.44%
YTD
-4.18%
1Y
-4.09%
3Y*
-0.76%
5Y*
-8.38%
10Y*
-2.49%

ISAC.L

1D
-0.92%
1M
-1.47%
6M
9.00%
YTD
10.73%
1Y
22.42%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGL.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBGL.L
iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-4.18%-0.80%-5.06%7.50%-30.45%-13.04%18.01%9.96%3.80%2.19%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.73%13.64%19.87%16.44%-8.43%19.97%12.26%20.97%-4.37%13.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IBGL.L and ISAC.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.09

Over the past year, IBGL.L and ISAC.L have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGL.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGL.L
IBGL.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IBGL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGL.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGL.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBGL.LISAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.33

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

3.25

-3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

11.85

-12.93

IBGL.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGL.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGL.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBGL.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGL.L drawdown since its inception was -46.77%, which is greater than ISAC.L's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGL.L and ISAC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGL.LISAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.77%

-25.84%

-20.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-6.88%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-18.33%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.54%

-18.33%

-23.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.77%

-25.84%

-20.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.87%

-2.45%

-40.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.72%

-3.51%

-11.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

1.89%

+2.10%

Volatility

IBGL.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGL.L) is 2.80%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that IBGL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGL.LISAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

3.31%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

10.05%

-2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.44%

12.43%

-2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.81%

14.39%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.87%

15.40%

-2.53%

IBGL.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBGL.L and ISAC.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBGL.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

IBGL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBGL.L
iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.83%3.48%3.23%2.65%1.28%0.55%0.73%1.28%1.48%1.32%1.41%1.78%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBGL.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBGL.L and ISAC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

IBGL.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. IBGL.L tracks iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist), while ISAC.L tracks MSCI All Country World Index (Net).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGL.L and ISAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer