PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGC vs. TLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGC vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF (IBGC) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBGC

1D
0.10%
1M
2.56%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTX

1D
-0.02%
1M
2.39%
YTD
1.98%
6M
1.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGC vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBGC and TLTX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGC vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF (IBGC) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBGC vs. TLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBGC vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum TLTX drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGC and TLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGCTLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-6.35%

+2.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.80%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.14%

-2.28%

+1.14%

Volatility

IBGC vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGCTLTXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.43%

9.24%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.43%

9.24%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.43%

9.24%

-0.81%

IBGC vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBGC vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

IBGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than TLTX's 17.11% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IBGC and TLTX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBGC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBGC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.11%, compared with 0.79% for IBGC.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGC and 0.29% for TLTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGC and TLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer