IBDZ vs. SLV
IBDZ (iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDZ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBDZ returned 5.23% vs 69.08% for SLV. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IBDZ vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDZ achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -13.49% return.
IBDZ
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 5.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- -5.40%
- 1M
- -18.48%
- YTD
- -13.49%
- 6M
- -14.05%
- 1Y
- 69.08%
- 3Y*
- 39.38%
- 5Y*
- 18.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
IBDZ vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBDZ iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate ETF | 0.39% | 8.84% | 4.23% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -13.49% | 144.66% | -4.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDZ and SLV is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2024 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDZ vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IBDZ
SLV
IBDZ vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate ETF (IBDZ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBDZ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.47 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 3.16 | +2.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBDZ vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDZ drawdown since its inception was -5.57%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDZ and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDZ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -76.28% | +70.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -47.23% | +44.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -47.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -47.23% | +46.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -44.65% | +43.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 21.91% | -20.93% |
Volatility
IBDZ vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate ETF (IBDZ) is 1.22%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.34%. This indicates that IBDZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDZ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 14.34% | -13.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.40% | 59.27% | -55.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69% | 60.33% | -55.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.23% | 36.59% | -30.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.23% | 32.09% | -25.86% |
IBDZ vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBDZ vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IBDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IBDZ iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate ETF | 4.86% | 4.85% | 2.50% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDZ and SLV have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to IBDZ (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDZ dropped -5.57% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 1-year performance, SLV leads with 69.08% vs 5.23% for IBDZ. On fees, IBDZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SLV has performed better with a 69.08% return vs 5.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBDZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IBDZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IBDZ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SLV is Silver. IBDZ tracks iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDZ and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBDZ and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer