IBDZ vs. IBIT
IBDZ (iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDZ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBDZ returned 5.23% vs -39.82% for IBIT. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
IBDZ vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDZ achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -28.88% return.
IBDZ
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 5.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -17.81%
- YTD
- -28.88%
- 6M
- -28.88%
- 1Y
- -39.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBDZ vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBDZ iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate ETF | 0.39% | 8.84% | 4.23% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -28.88% | -6.41% | 38.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDZ and IBIT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2024 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDZ vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
IBDZ
IBIT
IBDZ vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate ETF (IBDZ) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBDZ | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.86 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | -0.77 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | -1.30 | +6.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBDZ vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDZ drawdown since its inception was -5.57%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDZ and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDZ | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -52.11% | +46.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -52.11% | +49.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -50.47% | +49.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -16.85% | +15.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 30.58% | -29.60% |
Volatility
IBDZ vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate ETF (IBDZ) is 1.22%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that IBDZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDZ | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 13.18% | -11.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.40% | 34.64% | -31.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69% | 44.31% | -39.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.23% | 50.22% | -43.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.23% | 50.22% | -43.99% |
IBDZ vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBDZ vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
IBDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IBDZ iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate ETF | 4.86% | 4.85% | 2.50% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDZ and IBIT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to IBDZ (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDZ dropped -5.57% vs IBIT's -52.11%.
On 1-year performance, IBDZ leads with 5.23% vs -39.82% for IBIT. On fees, IBDZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBDZ has performed better with a 5.23% return vs -39.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBDZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
IBDZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IBDZ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IBDZ tracks iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDZ and 0.25% for IBIT.
IBDZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBDZ and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer