PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDY vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDY vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF (IBDY) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDY achieves a -0.03% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's -4.82% return.


IBDY

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.34%
6M
-0.11%
YTD
-0.03%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
5.91%
5Y*
10Y*

IAU

1D
-0.32%
1M
-2.44%
6M
-8.99%
YTD
-4.82%
1Y
22.05%
3Y*
28.26%
5Y*
17.54%
10Y*
11.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDY vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBDY
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF
-0.03%9.41%2.02%5.10%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-4.82%63.95%26.85%7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDY and IAU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDY vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDY
IBDY Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IBDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDY Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDY vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF (IBDY) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBDYIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

0.89

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

2.21

+2.13

IBDY vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDY and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBDY vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDY drawdown since its inception was -7.53%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDY and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDYIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-45.14%

+37.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-26.17%

+23.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.44%

-26.17%

+18.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-23.93%

+22.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-15.99%

+14.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

10.54%

-9.58%

Volatility

IBDY vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF (IBDY) is 1.23%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that IBDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDYIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

8.21%

-6.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

23.89%

-20.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12%

27.58%

-23.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.30%

18.28%

-11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.30%

16.03%

-9.73%

IBDY vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDY has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDY vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

IBDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBDY
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF
4.92%4.87%5.02%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDY and IAU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to IBDY (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDY dropped -7.53% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 3-year performance, IAU leads with 28.26% vs 5.91% for IBDY. On fees, IBDY is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDY has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IAU has performed better with a 28.26% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBDY is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.

IBDY has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

IBDY is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IAU is Gold. IBDY tracks Bloomberg December 2033 Maturity Corporate Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDY and 0.25% for IAU.

IBDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDY and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer