PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDY vs. BSCQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDY vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF (IBDY) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDY achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.68% return.


IBDY

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
10Y*

BSCQ

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.81%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
1.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDY vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBDY
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF
0.12%9.41%2.02%5.10%
BSCQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF
1.68%5.02%4.86%3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDY and BSCQ is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between IBDY and BSCQ has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDY vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDY
IBDY Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IBDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDY Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCQ
BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDY vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF (IBDY) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBDYBSCQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-13.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

3.43

-2.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

41.77

-39.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.62

181.80

-176.18

IBDY vs. BSCQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the BSCQ Sharpe Ratio of 7.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDY and BSCQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBDY vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDY drawdown since its inception was -7.53%, smaller than the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDY and BSCQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDYBSCQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-16.50%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-0.10%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.53%

-1.13%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-0.03%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-2.84%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.02%

+0.91%

Volatility

IBDY vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF (IBDY) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.13%. This indicates that IBDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDYBSCQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

0.13%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

0.43%

+2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

0.61%

+3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.34%

3.29%

+3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.34%

4.75%

+1.59%

IBDY vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBDY and BSCQ have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDY vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

IBDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than BSCQ's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BSCQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.14%4.05%3.53%2.54%1.91%2.42%2.96%3.32%2.92%0.51%
IBDY
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF
4.89%4.87%5.02%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDY and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBDY has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to BSCQ (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDY dropped -7.53% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.

On 3-year performance, IBDY leads with 5.73% vs 5.17% for BSCQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IBDY has performed better with a 5.73% return vs 5.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBDY and BSCQ have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBDY has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 4.46% for BSCQ.

IBDY tracks Bloomberg December 2033 Maturity Corporate Index, while BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.

BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.04 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDY and BSCQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer