PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDX vs. BSCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDX vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF (IBDX) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than BSCR's 1.60% return.


IBDX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.22%
6M
0.06%
YTD
0.14%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
10Y*

BSCR

1D
0.03%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.60%
YTD
1.60%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDX vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IBDX
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF
0.14%9.05%2.39%9.42%-1.92%
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.60%5.77%4.52%6.41%0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDX and BSCR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022

0.85

The correlation between IBDX and BSCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDX vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDX
IBDX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDX vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF (IBDX) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBDXBSCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

2.18

-0.98

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

10.47

-8.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.50

46.19

-41.69

IBDX vs. BSCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the BSCR Sharpe Ratio of 4.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDX and BSCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBDX vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDX drawdown since its inception was -12.51%, smaller than the maximum BSCR drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDX and BSCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDXBSCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.51%

-17.26%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-0.42%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.09%

-2.27%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

0.00%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-3.31%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.09%

+0.84%

Volatility

IBDX vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF (IBDX) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.20%. This indicates that IBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDXBSCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

0.20%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

0.60%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

1.01%

+2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.39%

4.08%

+3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.39%

5.32%

+2.07%

IBDX vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBDX and BSCR have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDX vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison

IBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than BSCR's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.28%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%
IBDX
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF
4.84%4.81%5.02%4.59%2.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDX and BSCR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBDX has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to BSCR (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDX dropped -12.51% vs BSCR's -17.26%.

On 3-year performance, IBDX leads with 5.93% vs 5.52% for BSCR. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IBDX has performed better with a 5.93% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBDX and BSCR have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 4.28% for BSCR.

IBDX tracks Bloomberg December 2032 Maturity Corporate Index, while BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.

BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.34 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDX and BSCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer