IBDW vs. FLOT
IBDW (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF) and FLOT (iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from iShares - IBDW tracks the Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index while FLOT tracks the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBDW returned 5.87%/yr vs 5.65%/yr for FLOT. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for FLOT.
Performance
IBDW vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDW achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT's 1.89% return.
IBDW
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLOT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 5.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
IBDW vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF | 0.14% | 9.07% | 2.96% | 9.40% | -17.13% | 0.36% |
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.89% | 4.91% | 6.53% | 6.43% | 1.28% | 0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDW and FLOT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDW vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank
IBDW
FLOT
IBDW vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBDW | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 3.31 | -2.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 11.42 | -9.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | 106.82 | -99.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDW | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 6.68 | -5.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.66 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
IBDW vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDW drawdown since its inception was -23.87%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDW and FLOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDW | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.87% | -13.54% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.42% | -0.43% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.61% | -1.57% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | 0.00% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.47% | -0.21% | -9.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 0.05% | +0.67% |
Volatility
IBDW vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.18%. This indicates that IBDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDW | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 0.18% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.42% | 0.62% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 0.74% | +2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 1.77% | +5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 4.15% | +3.11% |
IBDW vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOT's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBDW vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison
IBDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than FLOT's 4.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 4.53% | 4.84% | 5.82% | 5.66% | 2.06% | 0.43% | 1.25% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 1.46% | 0.97% | 0.53% |
IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF | 4.79% | 4.78% | 5.00% | 4.50% | 3.70% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDW and FLOT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBDW has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to FLOT (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDW dropped -23.87% vs FLOT's -13.54%.
On 3-year performance, IBDW leads with 5.87% vs 5.65% for FLOT. On fees, IBDW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IBDW has performed better with a 5.87% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBDW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FLOT.
IBDW has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.53% for FLOT.
IBDW tracks Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index, while FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDW and 0.20% for FLOT.
FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.68 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBDW and FLOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer