IBDV vs. DGRO
IBDV (iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDV is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2030 Maturity Corporate Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBDV returned 0.95%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for DGRO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
IBDV vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDV achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return.
IBDV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 5.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
IBDV vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDV iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF | 0.30% | 8.19% | 3.42% | 8.51% | -14.67% | -2.64% | 5.33% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 21.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDV and DGRO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.22 |
The correlation between IBDV and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDV vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
IBDV
DGRO
IBDV vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (IBDV) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBDV | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.43 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 3.50 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 13.52 | -5.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDV | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 2.39 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.77 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.76 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
IBDV vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDV drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDV and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDV | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -35.10% | +13.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.07% | -6.47% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.64% | -14.03% | +8.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.54% | -19.31% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.28% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -3.44% | -3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | 1.67% | -1.07% |
Volatility
IBDV vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (IBDV) is 0.83%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that IBDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDV | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 2.21% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.98% | 6.91% | -4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91% | 9.48% | -6.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 13.82% | -7.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.27% | 16.62% | -10.35% |
IBDV vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBDV vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
IBDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
IBDV iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF | 4.60% | 4.57% | 4.69% | 4.09% | 3.02% | 1.99% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDV and DGRO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRO has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to IBDV (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDV dropped -21.85% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 10.54% vs 0.95% for IBDV. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IBDV has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 0.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBDV.
IBDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.
IBDV is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IBDV tracks Bloomberg December 2030 Maturity Corporate Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDV and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBDV and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer