PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDQ vs. VTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDQ vs. VTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBDQ

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTC

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.33%
1Y
5.99%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDQ vs. VTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBDQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
0.00%4.13%5.12%5.23%-5.91%-1.49%8.27%13.59%-2.39%0.36%
VTC
Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF
0.60%7.58%2.15%8.58%-15.68%-1.41%9.30%14.60%-2.55%0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDQ and VTC is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between IBDQ and VTC has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDQ vs. VTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDQ

VTC
VTC Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTC Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
VTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTC Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDQ vs. VTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBDQ vs. VTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBDQVTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

Drawdowns

IBDQ vs. VTC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDQVTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

Volatility

IBDQ vs. VTC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDQVTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.68%

IBDQ vs. VTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTC's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDQ vs. VTC - Dividend Comparison

IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than VTC's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBDQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
2.08%3.77%3.81%3.27%2.23%2.07%2.51%3.21%3.52%3.28%3.39%2.64%
VTC
Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF
4.93%4.76%4.50%3.80%3.13%2.36%2.69%3.34%3.53%0.55%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDQ and VTC have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBDQ.

VTC has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 2.08% for IBDQ.

IBDQ tracks Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate, while VTC tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDQ and 0.04% for VTC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDQ and VTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer