IBDQ vs. VCLT
IBDQ (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF) and VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - IBDQ tracks the Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate while VCLT tracks the Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBDQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VCLT.
Performance
IBDQ vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBDQ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCLT
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- -1.73%
- 10Y*
- 2.37%
IBDQ vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 0.00% | 4.13% | 5.12% | 5.23% | -5.91% | -1.49% | 8.27% | 13.59% | -2.39% | 6.28% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% | 7.18% | -1.90% | 11.17% | -25.50% | -1.73% | 13.27% | 23.89% | -7.04% | 11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDQ and VCLT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015 | 0.54 |
The correlation between IBDQ and VCLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDQ vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank
IBDQ
VCLT
IBDQ vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDQ | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.40 | — |
Drawdowns
IBDQ vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDQ | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -14.12% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -8.16% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.13% | — |
Volatility
IBDQ vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDQ | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 7.93% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 12.77% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 12.84% | — |
IBDQ vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBDQ vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison
IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than VCLT's 5.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 2.08% | 3.77% | 3.81% | 3.27% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.51% | 3.21% | 3.52% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.64% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.53% | 5.51% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDQ and VCLT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCLT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBDQ.
VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 2.08% for IBDQ.
IBDQ tracks Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate, while VCLT tracks Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDQ and 0.04% for VCLT.
Find the right allocation for IBDQ and VCLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer