PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDQ vs. VCLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDQ vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBDQ

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VCLT

1D
0.28%
1M
1.13%
YTD
1.27%
6M
0.48%
1Y
6.83%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
-1.73%
10Y*
2.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDQ vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBDQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
0.00%4.13%5.12%5.23%-5.91%-1.49%8.27%13.59%-2.39%6.28%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
1.27%7.18%-1.90%11.17%-25.50%-1.73%13.27%23.89%-7.04%11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDQ and VCLT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015

0.54

The correlation between IBDQ and VCLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDQ vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDQ

VCLT
VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDQ vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBDQ vs. VCLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBDQVCLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

Drawdowns

IBDQ vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDQVCLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

Volatility

IBDQ vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDQVCLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.84%

IBDQ vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDQ vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison

IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than VCLT's 5.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBDQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
2.08%3.77%3.81%3.27%2.23%2.07%2.51%3.21%3.52%3.28%3.39%2.64%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.53%5.51%5.19%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDQ and VCLT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VCLT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBDQ.

VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 2.08% for IBDQ.

IBDQ tracks Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate, while VCLT tracks Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDQ and 0.04% for VCLT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDQ and VCLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer