IBDQ vs. QCON
IBDQ (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. IBDQ is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. IBDQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
IBDQ vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBDQ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBDQ vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 0.00% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDQ vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBDQ vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDQ | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | 0.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
IBDQ vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDQ | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 0.00% | — |
IBDQ vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBDQ vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 2.08% | 3.77% | 3.81% | 3.27% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.51% | 3.21% | 3.52% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.64% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IBDQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBDQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
IBDQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDQ and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for IBDQ and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer