IBDQ vs. BSCQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IBDQ (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - IBDQ tracks the Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate while BSCQ tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.

Performance

IBDQ vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IBDQ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSCQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 4.39%
• 3Y*: 5.05%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDQ vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF	0.00%	4.13%	5.12%	5.23%	-5.91%	-1.49%	8.27%	13.59%	-2.39%	6.28%
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	1.55%	5.02%	4.86%	5.71%	-8.31%	-1.68%	9.41%	13.94%	-2.40%	5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDQ and BSCQ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between IBDQ and BSCQ has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

IBDQ vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCQ

BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDQ vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBDQ	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	7.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.60	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IBDQ	BSCQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-16.50%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.85%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBDQ	BSCQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.63%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	3.30%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	4.77%	—

IBDQ vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBDQ and BSCQ have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IBDQ vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than BSCQ's 4.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.12%	4.14%	4.05%	3.53%	2.54%	1.91%	2.42%	2.96%	3.32%	2.92%	0.51%	0.00%
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF	2.08%	3.77%	3.81%	3.27%	2.23%	2.07%	2.51%	3.21%	3.52%	3.28%	3.39%	2.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBDQ and BSCQ in my portfolio?

IBDQ and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IBDQ or BSCQ?

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBDQ or BSCQ?

IBDQ and BSCQ have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBDQ or BSCQ?

BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 2.08% for IBDQ.

What is the main difference between IBDQ and BSCQ?

IBDQ tracks Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate, while BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.