IBDO vs. LQDW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IBDO (iShares iBonds Dec 2023 Term Corporate ETF) and LQDW (iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from iShares - IBDO tracks the Bloomberg December 2023 Maturity Corporate Index while LQDW tracks the CBOE LQD BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for LQDW.

Performance

IBDO vs. LQDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2023 Term Corporate ETF (IBDO) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IBDO

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQDW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.36%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: 6.49%
• 3Y*: 3.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDO vs. LQDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBDO iShares iBonds Dec 2023 Term Corporate ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.93%	0.69%
LQDW iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF	1.88%	9.05%	2.60%	3.99%	-6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDO and LQDW is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2022	0.11

The correlation between IBDO and LQDW shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (3 years) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IBDO vs. LQDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LQDW

LQDW Risk / Return Rank: 57
LQDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LQDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
LQDW Omega Ratio Rank: 64
LQDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
LQDW Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDO vs. LQDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2023 Term Corporate ETF (IBDO) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBDO	LQDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.80	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.55	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.52	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.34	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IBDO	LQDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-9.20%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.59%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.04%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.32%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBDO	LQDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.62%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	5.47%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	5.47%	—

IBDO vs. LQDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDW's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBDO vs. LQDW - Dividend Comparison

IBDO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.49%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBDO iShares iBonds Dec 2023 Term Corporate ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.61%	1.85%	2.04%	2.47%	3.01%	3.10%	2.96%	3.01%	2.39%
LQDW iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF	12.49%	16.02%	15.74%	19.28%	8.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBDO and LQDW in my portfolio?

IBDO and LQDW have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IBDO or LQDW?

On fees, IBDO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBDO or LQDW?

IBDO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for LQDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBDO or LQDW?

LQDW has the higher dividend yield at 12.49%, compared with 0.00% for IBDO.

What is the main difference between IBDO and LQDW?

IBDO tracks Bloomberg December 2023 Maturity Corporate Index, while LQDW tracks CBOE LQD BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDO and 0.34% for LQDW.