PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBD vs. FLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBD vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF (IBD) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBD vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBD
Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF
-0.41%7.70%3.58%6.00%-8.94%-1.89%5.15%7.97%1.37%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
0.61%5.41%5.71%6.32%-0.33%-0.18%2.01%4.52%0.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBD achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than FLDR's 0.61% return.


IBD

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*

FLDR

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
0.61%
6M
1.75%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBD vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IBD vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBD
IBD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBD Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBD vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF (IBD) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBDFLDRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

4.45

-3.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

6.66

-5.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

2.16

-0.99

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

5.87

-3.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.80

30.56

-23.76

IBD vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBD Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the FLDR Sharpe Ratio of 4.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBD and FLDR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBDFLDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

4.45

-3.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

2.97

-2.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.60

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between IBD and FLDR is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IBD vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

IBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than FLDR's 4.55% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBD
Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF
4.26%4.17%4.18%3.39%1.75%1.36%1.63%2.47%2.06%0.82%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.55%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBD vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBD drawdown since its inception was -16.30%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBD and FLDR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDFLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.30%

-12.23%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-0.76%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.76%

-2.33%

-12.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-0.19%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-0.36%

-3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.15%

+0.56%

Volatility

IBD vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF (IBD) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.42%. This indicates that IBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBDFLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

0.42%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.99%

0.57%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.01%

0.98%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.59%

1.21%

+4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.75%

5.32%

+1.43%