PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCS.DE vs. ECMA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCS.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCS.DE) and Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCS.DE achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than ECMA.DE's 1.12% return.


IBCS.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
0.70%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.59%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
0.79%

ECMA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.33%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCS.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IBCS.DE
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF
1.40%2.83%3.66%7.36%-0.47%
ECMA.DE
Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc
1.12%2.90%4.30%7.06%-0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCS.DE and ECMA.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022

0.92

The correlation between IBCS.DE and ECMA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCS.DE vs. ECMA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCS.DE
IBCS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
IBCS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ECMA.DE
ECMA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ECMA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCS.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCS.DE) and Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCS.DEECMA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.14

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

0.80

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

2.63

+0.29

IBCS.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the ECMA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCS.DE and ECMA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCS.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCS.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, which is greater than ECMA.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCS.DE and ECMA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCS.DEECMA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.87%

-8.91%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.78%

-2.68%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.78%

-2.68%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-0.15%

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-2.08%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.81%

+0.01%

Volatility

IBCS.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCS.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) at 0.78%. This indicates that IBCS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECMA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCS.DEECMA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.78%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

2.77%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38%

3.11%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.74%

4.16%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.47%

4.16%

+0.31%

IBCS.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ECMA.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCS.DE vs. ECMA.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBCS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, while ECMA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECMA.DE
Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBCS.DE
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF
3.11%3.03%2.74%2.31%1.05%0.73%0.85%0.99%1.10%1.09%1.27%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCS.DE and ECMA.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ECMA.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ECMA.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IBCS.DE.

IBCS.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Liquid Corporates Large Cap, while ECMA.DE tracks Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IBCS.DE and 0.19% for ECMA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCS.DE and ECMA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer