PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECMA.DE vs. CBUJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECMA.DE vs. CBUJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Dist (CBUJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECMA.DE achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than CBUJ.DE's 0.55% return.


ECMA.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.46%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
10Y*

CBUJ.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.50%
1Y
2.15%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECMA.DE vs. CBUJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ECMA.DE
Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc
0.50%2.90%4.30%7.06%-1.21%
CBUJ.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.55%3.00%4.25%7.46%-1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ECMA.DE and CBUJ.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2022

0.95

The correlation between ECMA.DE and CBUJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECMA.DE vs. CBUJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECMA.DE
ECMA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ECMA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECMA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUJ.DE
CBUJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CBUJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECMA.DE vs. CBUJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Dist (CBUJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECMA.DECBUJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.11

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.66

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

2.25

-0.17

ECMA.DE vs. CBUJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECMA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the CBUJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECMA.DE and CBUJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECMA.DECBUJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

0.58

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.81

0.00

Drawdowns

ECMA.DE vs. CBUJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECMA.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, roughly equal to the maximum CBUJ.DE drawdown of -8.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECMA.DE and CBUJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECMA.DECBUJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-8.89%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-2.73%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.68%

-2.73%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.74%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-2.10%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.81%

-0.01%

Volatility

ECMA.DE vs. CBUJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc (ECMA.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Dist (CBUJ.DE) have volatilities of 1.28% and 1.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECMA.DECBUJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

1.28%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

2.76%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13%

3.11%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.16%

4.35%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.16%

4.35%

-0.19%

ECMA.DE vs. CBUJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECMA.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUJ.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ECMA.DE vs. CBUJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

ECMA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBUJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CBUJ.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF EUR Dist
3.55%3.52%3.48%2.96%0.12%
ECMA.DE
Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ECMA.DE and CBUJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CBUJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ECMA.DE.

ECMA.DE tracks Invesco EUR Corporate Bond ESG Multi-Factor, while CBUJ.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate Climate Paris Aligned ESG Select. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ECMA.DE and 0.15% for CBUJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECMA.DE and CBUJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer