IBCI.DE vs. XEIN.DE
IBCI.DE (iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF) and XEIN.DE (Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBCI.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index while XEIN.DE tracks the iBoxx Euro Inflation-Linked Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBCI.DE returned 1.37%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for XEIN.DE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBCI.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XEIN.DE.
Performance
IBCI.DE vs. XEIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IBCI.DE having a 2.73% return and XEIN.DE slightly higher at 2.76%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: IBCI.DE at 1.37% and XEIN.DE at 1.37%.
IBCI.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 1.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.45%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
XEIN.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 2.86%
- 3Y*
- 1.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
IBCI.DE vs. XEIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCI.DE iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF | 2.73% | 0.81% | -0.17% | 5.41% | -9.30% | 6.19% | 2.83% | 6.31% | -1.54% | 1.05% |
XEIN.DE Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 2.76% | 0.88% | -0.23% | 5.58% | -9.52% | 6.29% | 2.73% | 6.38% | -1.48% | 1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCI.DE and XEIN.DE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IBCI.DE and XEIN.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCI.DE vs. XEIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCI.DE
XEIN.DE
IBCI.DE vs. XEIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) and Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBCI.DE | XEIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.49 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 4.10 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBCI.DE vs. XEIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCI.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, roughly equal to the maximum XEIN.DE drawdown of -16.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCI.DE and XEIN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCI.DE | XEIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.37% | -16.30% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.87% | -1.91% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.34% | -5.33% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.37% | -16.30% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.37% | -16.30% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -5.99% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -3.83% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 0.70% | +0.02% |
Volatility
IBCI.DE vs. XEIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) is 0.80%, while Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) has a volatility of 0.93%. This indicates that IBCI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCI.DE | XEIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 0.93% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 2.77% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 3.69% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.85% | 6.75% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.15% | 6.15% | 0.00% |
IBCI.DE vs. XEIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCI.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XEIN.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBCI.DE vs. XEIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCI.DE nor XEIN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCI.DE and XEIN.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCI.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCI.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XEIN.DE.
IBCI.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while XEIN.DE tracks iBoxx Euro Inflation-Linked Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IBCI.DE and 0.15% for XEIN.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCI.DE and XEIN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer