IBCI.DE vs. DBMF
IBCI.DE (iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBCI.DE is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. IBCI.DE is passively managed, while DBMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBCI.DE returned 0.72%/yr vs 9.11%/yr for DBMF. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. IBCI.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.
Performance
IBCI.DE vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBCI.DE is traded in EUR, while DBMF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DBMF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCI.DE achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 11.85% return.
IBCI.DE
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 3.37%
- 3Y*
- 1.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
DBMF
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 26.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCI.DE vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCI.DE iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF | 3.15% | 0.81% | -0.17% | 5.41% | -9.30% | 6.19% | 2.83% | 4.78% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 11.85% | 0.34% | 14.32% | -11.67% | 29.14% | 19.83% | -6.59% | 10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCI.DE and DBMF is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019 | -0.08 |
The correlation between IBCI.DE and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (5 years) to 0.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCI.DE vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
IBCI.DE
DBMF
IBCI.DE vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCI.DE | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.44 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 4.90 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 17.42 | -13.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCI.DE | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.11 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.57 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.57 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
IBCI.DE vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCI.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum DBMF drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCI.DE and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCI.DE | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.37% | -29.19% | +12.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.87% | -5.53% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.59% | -19.60% | +14.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.37% | -29.19% | +12.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.54% | -7.80% | +2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -12.90% | +7.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 1.55% | -0.77% |
Volatility
IBCI.DE vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) is 1.58%, while iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that IBCI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCI.DE | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 2.66% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.04% | 9.94% | -6.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.83% | 12.84% | -9.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.86% | 16.03% | -9.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 15.34% | -9.18% |
IBCI.DE vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCI.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBCI.DE vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
IBCI.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.22% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% |
IBCI.DE iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCI.DE and DBMF have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCI.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCI.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
IBCI.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IBCI.DE and 0.85% for DBMF.
Find the right allocation for IBCI.DE and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer