IBCG.DE vs. XNKY.DE
IBCG.DE (iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XNKY.DE (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - IBCG.DE tracks the MSCI Japan Index (EUR Hedged) while XNKY.DE tracks the Nikkei 225®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBCG.DE returned 19.57%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for XNKY.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBCG.DE charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XNKY.DE.
Performance
IBCG.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCG.DE achieves a 21.27% return, which is significantly lower than XNKY.DE's 36.19% return.
IBCG.DE
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 20.86%
- YTD
- 21.27%
- 1Y
- 48.23%
- 3Y*
- 25.91%
- 5Y*
- 19.57%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
XNKY.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 36.04%
- YTD
- 36.19%
- 1Y
- 60.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCG.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCG.DE iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) | 21.27% | 26.94% | 22.76% | 32.85% | -5.89% | 12.06% | 9.71% |
XNKY.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF | 36.19% | 16.16% | 14.34% | 18.03% | -15.35% | 3.16% | 7.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCG.DE and XNKY.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IBCG.DE and XNKY.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCG.DE vs. XNKY.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCG.DE
XNKY.DE
IBCG.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCG.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBCG.DE | XNKY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.40 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 4.69 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.49 | 14.08 | +2.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBCG.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCG.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, which is greater than XNKY.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCG.DE and XNKY.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCG.DE | XNKY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -21.47% | -13.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.94% | -12.99% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.63% | -20.16% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.63% | -21.15% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | -5.73% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -7.80% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 4.33% | -1.41% |
Volatility
IBCG.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCG.DE) is 6.70%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that IBCG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNKY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCG.DE | XNKY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 9.58% | -2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.91% | 20.53% | -4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 25.21% | -5.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 19.02% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 18.69% | -0.24% |
IBCG.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCG.DE has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than XNKY.DE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBCG.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCG.DE nor XNKY.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCG.DE and XNKY.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IBCG.DE.
IBCG.DE tracks MSCI Japan Index (EUR Hedged), while XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for IBCG.DE and 0.09% for XNKY.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCG.DE and XNKY.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer