IBCC.DE vs. IS3N.DE
IBCC.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IBCC.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBCC.DE returned 4.17%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for IS3N.DE. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. IBCC.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
IBCC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCC.DE achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 26.15% return.
IBCC.DE
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- 3.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- —
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- 6M
- 22.85%
- YTD
- 26.15%
- 1Y
- 42.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
IBCC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.60% | -7.23% | 11.42% | 1.23% | 7.25% | 8.42% | -8.13% | -8.71% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 26.15% | 17.14% | 13.88% | 7.20% | -13.85% | 7.09% | 7.07% | 11.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCC.DE and IS3N.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCC.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCC.DE
IS3N.DE
IBCC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBCC.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.40 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 4.04 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 13.47 | -8.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBCC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCC.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCC.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -35.06% | +18.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.24% | -10.52% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | -19.18% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.69% | -21.99% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -4.56% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.99% | -9.24% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 3.16% | -1.73% |
Volatility
IBCC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) is 1.88%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that IBCC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCC.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.88% | 8.89% | -7.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.35% | 16.69% | -12.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.23% | 19.07% | -12.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 16.62% | -9.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 18.15% | -9.72% |
IBCC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCC.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBCC.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
IBCC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.99% | 4.63% | 6.49% | 4.14% | 0.47% | 0.09% | 1.39% | 1.22% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCC.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCC.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCC.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
IBCC.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. IBCC.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBCC.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCC.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer