PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCA vs. VTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCA vs. VTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCA achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly higher than VTG's -0.11% return.


IBCA

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.04%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTG

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.11%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
-0.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCA vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBCA and VTG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCA vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCA
IBCA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IBCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VTG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCA vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBCAVTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

IBCA vs. VTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBCAVTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.88

+0.20

Drawdowns

IBCA vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, which is greater than VTG's maximum drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCA and VTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCAVTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-2.89%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-1.89%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.81%

-0.73%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

Volatility

IBCA vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCAVTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

3.51%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

3.51%

+2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

3.51%

+2.25%

IBCA vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCA vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison

IBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than VTG's 3.21% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IBCA and VTG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBCA.

IBCA has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 3.21% for VTG.

IBCA tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Corporate Index, while VTG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBCA and 0.03% for VTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCA and VTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer