PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBC9.DE vs. SRLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBC9.DE vs. SRLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IBC9.DE) and State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBC9.DE is traded in EUR, while SRLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SRLN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IBC9.DE having a 3.53% return and SRLN slightly higher at 3.63%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IBC9.DE having a 4.37% annualized return and SRLN not far behind at 4.25%.


IBC9.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.65%
YTD
3.53%
6M
3.61%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
4.37%

SRLN

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.01%
YTD
3.63%
6M
4.09%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
5.83%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
4.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBC9.DE vs. SRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBC9.DE
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
3.53%1.08%9.31%9.25%-6.54%8.55%-2.14%14.98%0.23%-3.66%
SRLN
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
3.63%-5.90%15.59%8.27%0.57%12.30%-5.37%12.51%4.01%-9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between IBC9.DE and SRLN is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2013

0.54

The correlation between IBC9.DE and SRLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBC9.DE vs. SRLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBC9.DE
IBC9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IBC9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBC9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBC9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IBC9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBC9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SRLN
SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBC9.DE vs. SRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IBC9.DE) and State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBC9.DESRLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

1.43

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.37

4.27

+5.10

IBC9.DE vs. SRLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBC9.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the SRLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBC9.DE and SRLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBC9.DE vs. SRLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBC9.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.22%, which is greater than SRLN's maximum drawdown of -21.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC9.DE and SRLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBC9.DESRLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.22%

-21.84%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.22%

-4.94%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.79%

-12.51%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.00%

-12.51%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.34%

-21.84%

-0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-3.85%

+3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-4.64%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.65%

-0.97%

Volatility

IBC9.DE vs. SRLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IBC9.DE) is 0.88%, while State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that IBC9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBC9.DESRLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

1.30%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

4.67%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

6.43%

-2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

7.73%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.85%

8.99%

-1.14%

IBC9.DE vs. SRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBC9.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SRLN's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBC9.DE vs. SRLN - Dividend Comparison

IBC9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, less than SRLN's 7.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBC9.DE
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
7.00%5.55%5.32%4.88%4.06%3.76%4.80%4.78%4.77%5.03%4.78%5.18%
SRLN
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
7.52%7.67%8.58%8.44%5.72%4.45%4.91%5.39%4.98%4.01%3.94%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBC9.DE and SRLN have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBC9.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBC9.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.

IBC9.DE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SRLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBC9.DE and 0.70% for SRLN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBC9.DE and SRLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer