IBC6.DE vs. SXR1.DE
IBC6.DE (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF) and SXR1.DE (iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - IBC6.DE tracks the MSCI Australia while SXR1.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBC6.DE returned 8.07%/yr vs 7.48%/yr for SXR1.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBC6.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SXR1.DE.
Performance
IBC6.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBC6.DE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than SXR1.DE's 8.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IBC6.DE has outperformed SXR1.DE with an annualized return of 8.07%, while SXR1.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
IBC6.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
SXR1.DE
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- 8.90%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 13.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
IBC6.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 10.86% | 1.01% | 8.47% | 10.05% | -0.95% | 18.21% | -1.41% | 25.74% | -7.69% | 5.50% |
SXR1.DE iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) | 8.90% | 7.00% | 11.91% | 2.20% | -0.86% | 13.17% | -2.98% | 21.74% | -6.20% | 10.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBC6.DE and SXR1.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IBC6.DE and SXR1.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBC6.DE vs. SXR1.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBC6.DE
SXR1.DE
IBC6.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBC6.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.22 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.25 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 6.64 | -2.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBC6.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.19 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.39 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.45 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.27 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
IBC6.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBC6.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, which is greater than SXR1.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC6.DE and SXR1.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBC6.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.64% | -38.62% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | -6.21% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -20.28% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -20.28% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.64% | -36.91% | -6.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -2.17% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -9.79% | +1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.11% | +0.81% |
Volatility
IBC6.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) at 3.06%. This indicates that IBC6.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXR1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBC6.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 3.06% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 9.04% | +1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 11.73% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 14.73% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 16.60% | +2.71% |
IBC6.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBC6.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SXR1.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBC6.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBC6.DE nor SXR1.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IBC6.DE and SXR1.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SXR1.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXR1.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBC6.DE.
IBC6.DE tracks MSCI Australia, while SXR1.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBC6.DE and 0.20% for SXR1.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBC6.DE and SXR1.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer