IBC3.DE vs. XGLF.DE
IBC3.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF) and XGLF.DE (Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IBC3.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI) while XGLF.DE tracks the MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBC3.DE returned 7.44%/yr vs 5.07%/yr for XGLF.DE. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBC3.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XGLF.DE.
Performance
IBC3.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBC3.DE achieves a 19.60% return, which is significantly higher than XGLF.DE's 4.58% return.
IBC3.DE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- 6M
- 12.05%
- YTD
- 19.60%
- 1Y
- 32.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- —
XGLF.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
IBC3.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC3.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF | 19.60% | 17.06% | 13.96% | 7.10% | -13.77% | 6.90% | 7.20% | 21.13% | -27.74% |
XGLF.DE Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 4.58% | -5.36% | 9.58% | 0.55% | 1.24% | 48.84% | -9.49% | 9.50% | 24.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBC3.DE and XGLF.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2018 | 0.42 |
The correlation between IBC3.DE and XGLF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBC3.DE vs. XGLF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBC3.DE
XGLF.DE
IBC3.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBC3.DE | XGLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.05 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 0.28 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.92 | 0.60 | +8.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBC3.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBC3.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.21%, roughly equal to the maximum XGLF.DE drawdown of -42.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC3.DE and XGLF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBC3.DE | XGLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.21% | -42.15% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -9.05% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -18.41% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.10% | -31.29% | +9.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.06% | -18.93% | +8.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.90% | -18.25% | +5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 4.18% | -0.57% |
Volatility
IBC3.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE) at 3.12%. This indicates that IBC3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGLF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBC3.DE | XGLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.55% | 3.12% | +5.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.51% | 9.08% | +10.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.83% | 12.57% | +9.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 15.37% | +2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 18.33% | +1.69% |
IBC3.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBC3.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XGLF.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBC3.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Dividend Comparison
IBC3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while XGLF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC3.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF | 1.69% | 1.97% | 2.22% | 2.52% | 3.25% | 1.84% | 1.81% | 2.30% | 1.79% |
XGLF.DE Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBC3.DE and XGLF.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBC3.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBC3.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XGLF.DE.
IBC3.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while XGLF.DE tracks MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBC3.DE and 0.65% for XGLF.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBC3.DE and XGLF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer