IBC3.DE vs. H4Z3.DE
IBC3.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF) and H4Z3.DE (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IBC3.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI) while H4Z3.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBC3.DE returned 20.30%/yr vs 20.42%/yr for H4Z3.DE. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IBC3.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for H4Z3.DE.
Performance
IBC3.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBC3.DE achieves a 25.91% return, which is significantly lower than H4Z3.DE's 27.75% return.
IBC3.DE
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 25.91%
- 6M
- 27.63%
- 1Y
- 47.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- —
H4Z3.DE
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 6.24%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 29.51%
- 1Y
- 50.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBC3.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC3.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF | 25.91% | 17.59% | 14.06% | 7.48% | -5.35% |
H4Z3.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 27.75% | 18.60% | 13.73% | 4.66% | -6.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBC3.DE and H4Z3.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022 | 0.99 |
The correlation between IBC3.DE and H4Z3.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBC3.DE vs. H4Z3.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBC3.DE
H4Z3.DE
IBC3.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBC3.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.52 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 4.77 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.28 | 17.12 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBC3.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.85 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.91 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
IBC3.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBC3.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.89%, which is greater than H4Z3.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC3.DE and H4Z3.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBC3.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.89% | -18.86% | -13.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -10.47% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.08% | -18.86% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -2.73% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -4.95% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.92% | -0.03% |
Volatility
IBC3.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE) have volatilities of 7.06% and 7.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBC3.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.06% | 7.35% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.60% | 14.91% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.37% | 17.54% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 15.77% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 15.77% | +2.65% |
IBC3.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBC3.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than H4Z3.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBC3.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Dividend Comparison
IBC3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while H4Z3.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4Z3.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBC3.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF | 1.88% | 2.26% | 2.44% | 2.69% | 3.36% | 2.18% | 2.09% | 2.56% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, IBC3.DE and H4Z3.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, H4Z3.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4Z3.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBC3.DE.
IBC3.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while H4Z3.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBC3.DE and 0.15% for H4Z3.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBC3.DE and H4Z3.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer