IBC3.DE vs. H41E.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IBC3.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF) and H41E.DE (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IBC3.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI) while H41E.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Value SRI ESG Target Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBC3.DE returned 20.30%/yr vs 27.78%/yr for H41E.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBC3.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for H41E.DE.

Performance

IBC3.DE vs. H41E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBC3.DE achieves a 25.91% return, which is significantly lower than H41E.DE's 39.52% return.

IBC3.DE

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 25.91%
• 6M: 27.63%
• 1Y: 47.26%
• 3Y*: 20.30%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —

H41E.DE

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 11.44%
• YTD: 39.52%
• 6M: 42.99%
• 1Y: 69.89%
• 3Y*: 27.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBC3.DE vs. H41E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBC3.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF	25.91%	17.59%	14.06%	7.48%	-2.66%
H41E.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	39.52%	22.02%	17.74%	11.43%	-2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IBC3.DE and H41E.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022	0.94

The correlation between IBC3.DE and H41E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IBC3.DE vs. H41E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBC3.DE

IBC3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 83
IBC3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IBC3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
IBC3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 83
IBC3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
IBC3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

H41E.DE

H41E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
H41E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
H41E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
H41E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
H41E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
H41E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBC3.DE vs. H41E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBC3.DE	H41E.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	3.91	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	5.00	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.69	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.51	7.09	-2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.28	25.00	-8.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBC3.DE vs. H41E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBC3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is lower than the H41E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBC3.DE and H41E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBC3.DE	H41E.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	3.91	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	1.56	-1.09

Drawdowns

IBC3.DE vs. H41E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBC3.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.89%, which is greater than H41E.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC3.DE and H41E.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBC3.DE	H41E.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.89%	-20.92%	-10.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.42%	-9.80%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.08%	-20.92%	+1.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-3.33%	+0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.84%	-3.10%	-4.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	2.79%	+0.10%

Volatility

IBC3.DE vs. H41E.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) is 7.06%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41E.DE) has a volatility of 7.97%. This indicates that IBC3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H41E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBC3.DE	H41E.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.06%	7.97%	-0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.60%	14.66%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.37%	17.80%	-0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	16.06%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	16.06%	+2.36%

IBC3.DE vs. H41E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBC3.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than H41E.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBC3.DE vs. H41E.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBC3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while H41E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
H41E.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBC3.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF	1.88%	2.26%	2.44%	2.69%	3.36%	2.18%	2.09%	2.56%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBC3.DE and H41E.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, IBC3.DE and H41E.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, IBC3.DE or H41E.DE?

On fees, IBC3.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBC3.DE or H41E.DE?

IBC3.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for H41E.DE.

What is the main difference between IBC3.DE and H41E.DE?

IBC3.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while H41E.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value SRI ESG Target Select. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBC3.DE and 0.35% for H41E.DE.