PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBC3.DE vs. 5MVL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBC3.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBC3.DE achieves a 25.91% return, which is significantly lower than 5MVL.DE's 45.83% return.


IBC3.DE

1D
-1.44%
1M
3.09%
YTD
25.91%
6M
26.49%
1Y
46.24%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*

5MVL.DE

1D
-2.48%
1M
9.31%
YTD
45.83%
6M
46.38%
1Y
81.35%
3Y*
33.99%
5Y*
17.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBC3.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBC3.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF
25.91%17.59%14.06%7.48%-13.80%7.38%7.44%21.30%-2.33%
5MVL.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
45.83%27.25%21.00%14.58%-10.54%13.07%-2.40%20.39%-2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IBC3.DE and 5MVL.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018

0.92

The correlation between IBC3.DE and 5MVL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBC3.DE vs. 5MVL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBC3.DE
IBC3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IBC3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBC3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBC3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IBC3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBC3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

5MVL.DE
5MVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
5MVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBC3.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBC3.DE5MVL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.73

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

8.86

-4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.28

28.83

-12.55

IBC3.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBC3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is lower than the 5MVL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBC3.DE and 5MVL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBC3.DE5MVL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

4.31

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.02

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.83

-0.36

Drawdowns

IBC3.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBC3.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.89%, roughly equal to the maximum 5MVL.DE drawdown of -32.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC3.DE and 5MVL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBC3.DE5MVL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-32.25%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-9.30%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

-19.15%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

-20.60%

-1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-3.88%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-6.27%

-1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.87%

+0.02%

Volatility

IBC3.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) is 7.06%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) has a volatility of 8.71%. This indicates that IBC3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5MVL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBC3.DE5MVL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.06%

8.71%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.60%

15.83%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.37%

19.13%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

16.78%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

18.84%

-0.42%

IBC3.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBC3.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than 5MVL.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBC3.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBC3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while 5MVL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
5MVL.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBC3.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF
1.88%2.26%2.44%2.69%3.36%2.18%2.09%2.56%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IBC3.DE and 5MVL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IBC3.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBC3.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 5MVL.DE.

IBC3.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while 5MVL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Select Value Factor Focus. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBC3.DE and 0.40% for 5MVL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBC3.DE and 5MVL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer