IBBQ vs. PJP
IBBQ (Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) and PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Invesco - IBBQ tracks the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index while PJP tracks the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBBQ returned 5.42%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for PJP. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IBBQ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PJP.
Performance
IBBQ vs. PJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBBQ achieves a 13.32% return, which is significantly lower than PJP's 16.81% return.
IBBQ
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 13.32%
- 1Y
- 44.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.42%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.57%
PJP
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 16.01%
- YTD
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 48.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $517.67K | $836.57K | $727.46K | |
| $5.48M | $7.14M | $3.39M |
IBBQ vs. PJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 13.32% | 33.32% | -0.63% | 4.73% | -10.41% | -6.24% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 16.81% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | -0.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBBQ and PJP is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IBBQ and PJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
IBBQ vs. PJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBBQ
PJP
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IBBQ
PJP
Consumer Defensive
IBBQ
PJP
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBBQ
PJP
-
Financial Services
IBBQ
PJP
Industrials
IBBQ
PJP
-
Basic Materials
IBBQ
-
PJP
-
Communication Services
IBBQ
-
PJP
-
Energy
IBBQ
-
PJP
-
Real Estate
IBBQ
-
PJP
-
Technology
IBBQ
-
PJP
-
Utilities
IBBQ
-
PJP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBBQ vs. PJP — Risk / Return Rank
IBBQ
PJP
IBBQ vs. PJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBBQ | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.51 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.49 | 5.53 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.87 | 17.34 | -1.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBBQ vs. PJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBBQ drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, roughly equal to the maximum PJP drawdown of -37.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBBQ and PJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBBQ | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.94% | -37.06% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -9.44% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.66% | -16.27% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.94% | -17.51% | -20.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.14% | -1.10% | -5.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.38% | -8.79% | -7.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 3.01% | -0.13% |
Volatility
IBBQ vs. PJP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) at 5.97%. This indicates that IBBQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBBQ | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 5.97% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 13.25% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.18% | 17.00% | +3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.98% | 16.37% | +5.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.85% | 18.38% | +3.47% |
IBBQ vs. PJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBBQ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PJP's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBBQ vs. PJP - Dividend Comparison
IBBQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than PJP's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.80% | 0.90% | 1.14% | 0.81% | 0.76% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.88% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBBQ and PJP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBBQ has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to PJP (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBBQ dropped -37.94% vs PJP's -37.06%.
On 5-year performance, PJP leads with 9.51% vs 5.42% for IBBQ. On fees, IBBQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PJP has performed better with a 9.51% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBBQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PJP.
PJP has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.80% for IBBQ.
IBBQ tracks Nasdaq Biotechnology Index, while PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IBBQ and 0.58% for PJP.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBBQ and PJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer