IBAT vs. PPL.TO
IBAT (iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials, while PPL.TO (Pembina Pipeline Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, IBAT returned 105.19% vs 32.53% for PPL.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBAT vs. PPL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBAT is traded in USD, while PPL.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the PPL.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBAT achieves a 51.63% return, which is significantly higher than PPL.TO's 28.18% return.
IBAT
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- 51.63%
- 6M
- 46.54%
- 1Y
- 105.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPL.TO
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 28.18%
- 6M
- 26.37%
- 1Y
- 32.53%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
IBAT vs. PPL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBAT iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF | 51.63% | 32.09% | -13.29% |
PPL.TO Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 28.18% | 8.72% | 10.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBAT and PPL.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024 | 0.09 |
The correlation between IBAT and PPL.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBAT vs. PPL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
IBAT
PPL.TO
IBAT vs. PPL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBAT | PPL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.31 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.45 | 2.80 | +4.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.84 | 6.47 | +14.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBAT vs. PPL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBAT drawdown since its inception was -28.26%, smaller than the maximum PPL.TO drawdown of -71.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBAT and PPL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBAT | PPL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.26% | -71.00% | +42.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -12.40% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.98% | -2.65% | -6.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -14.11% | +6.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 5.35% | -0.45% |
Volatility
IBAT vs. PPL.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) has a higher volatility of 13.41% compared to Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) at 6.14%. This indicates that IBAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBAT | PPL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.41% | 6.14% | +7.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.68% | 13.80% | +8.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.18% | 19.58% | +8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 19.85% | +4.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 31.56% | -6.98% |
Dividends
IBAT vs. PPL.TO - Dividend Comparison
IBAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than PPL.TO's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBAT iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF | 0.76% | 1.15% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PPL.TO Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 4.20% | 5.39% | 5.15% | 5.82% | 5.55% | 6.57% | 8.37% | 4.90% | 5.53% | 4.48% | 4.52% | 5.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBAT and PPL.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IBAT and PPL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer